But, according to Ron Unz, a funny thing then happened. The number of
qualified Asian-Americans continued to rise, but the number of
Asian-Americans admitted to Harvard fell so that the student body was
about 16 percent Asian. Between 1995 and 2011, Harvard’s Asian-American
population has varied by less than a percentage point around that 16.5
percent average. Not only that, the percentage of Asian-Americans at
other Ivy League schools has also settled at a remarkably stable 16
percent, year after year.
"This smells like a quota system, or at least that was the implication
left by Unz’s searing, sprawling, frustrating and highly debatable
piece, 'The Myth of the American Meritocracy,'
in The American Conservative," wrote David Brooks in the New York Times.
"You’re going to want to argue with Unz’s article all the way along,
especially for its narrow, math-test-driven view of merit. But it’s
potentially ground-shifting. Unz’s other big point is that Jews are
vastly overrepresented at elite universities and that Jewish achievement
has collapsed," Brooks continued. "In the 1970s, for example, 40 percent of top scorers in
the Math Olympiad had Jewish names. Now 2.5 percent do. The fanatical
generations of immigrant strivers have been replaced by a more
comfortable generation of preprofessionals, he implies."